Not viable knowledge.
Popular articles by jounalists tend to fall in two camps. Either they over state the danger and talk about being eaten by bears. Or they dismiss them as not being a threat at all.
Reality is somewhere in the middle. Most black bears give humans some room. They can be emboldened by food and protecting their young. Treat them as individuals. Make some noise when you travel so they know you are coming. I like hiking with my dog because she gives me some notice.
According to the article, the sheriffs cite the bear’s predatory behavior and say there was nothing on the man’s property that would have attracted the bear.
This is why I posted the original question so very long ago….the number of apparent predatory Black bear encounters seems to be on the rise over the last 4 years or so and I was curious if I could find first or second hand accounts from around Lake Superior.
The man was camping while building his house. Other people heard his screams and tried to scare the bear off by honking horns. That means other people were right next door. I would think if there was a regular bear visiting, it would have been mentioned during the investigation.
While coffee could pique a bear’s interest the same as any other smell, I doubt the bear was after the coffee. A Black bear silently attacking without warning is predatory behavior. This bad boy was looking for a meal. Just goes to show how quiet something that weighs up to 500 pounds can be.
There have been a few reports from the Thunder Bay area down into Minnesota’s Arrowhead in recent years, but as I recall they all involved dogs or cubs or food in some way. Nothing on the south shore of Superior that I can remember (knock wood - preferably a nice cedar and spruce ADK guide boat).
Pure speculation here, but if he was camping then perhaps he was cooking over a campfire. Bears will definitely investigate chicken drippins and such in fire pits, but that still doesn’t explain the predatory behavior.
Yeah, but how frequent is the question. It’s more common to get struck by lightening, but us biologists like to quantify, eh?
Most of the reports I’ve read are from hunters in somewhat dense hardwood forest walking wildlife trails. Because they were looking for game, they spotted the bear stalking them and could take some measures to be safe. Plus, they had a long gun, of course. Interestingly, in all cases where a determination was able to be made, the predatory bears were males. There are the other posts here, of course, about people being attacked at their mailbox, etc. but those seem rare.
I’ve talked with DNR wildlife biologists in MN and WI who said lakeshore encounters are rare as long as you avoid wildlife trails to the water and look for sign. They said most reported bear encounters are at homes or breaking into cars at trailheads.