Yeah, the Left is so tolerant and understanding. Elon Musk is uncovering over a TRILLION DOLLARS a year in waste, fraud and corruption so we can better take care of the underprivileged, finally address our infrastructure and do some maintenance on our National Debt, a TRILLION DOLLARS and what does the Left do, Firebomb Tesla Dealerships, Shoot Bullets into Tesla Dealerships, Set Tesla vehicles on fire, Key Tesla Vehicles, Harass and Intimidate Tesla Drivers on the road, cause Tesla Stock to drop 50%âŚWhat a bunch of Phony Clowns. Come and try and burn my property and see what happens to you.Y Chromosome that.
2 Likes
The problem with people is that both sides feel like theyâre the injured party. Itâs always about gaining absolute power, not about fixing anything.
I canât blame anyone for disagreeing with the methods, but it defies logic to ignore the extentsive fraud and the level of resistance to eliminate it. The primary rule of ethics in government is âno impropriety or appearance of inpropriety.â Anyone can dislike how the evidence was uncovered, but its criminal to allow it to continue. The only acceptable option is agreement to investigate by offering solutions on how to better find the corruption. The combined set of our elected officials are too ill equipped to lead.
The solution is either compromise, or put all the power in a monarch and let the line of succession go through the family and hope for benevolence.
Thatâs what bosses are paid to do, yell at people. If you ask why he gets to yell at you and you canât - the answer is that heâs the boss and youâre not.
I was a boss for 40 years and seldom yelled at anyone except my kids. If I needed to yell at an employee they werenât around long.
2 Likes
Isnât compromise out of the question in todayâs politics? If so, that leaves only one other choice ⌠and not one that inspires optimism.
1 Like
It shouldnât be. Without judging the merits of either side or offering solutions (we pay them to do that), isnât it logical to expect your representatives to eliminate waste. As I mentioned, the solution would clearly raise disagreement and debate. We canât even reach that. One side exposes fraud and the other side doesnât even ask for evidence or proof. The topic goes to name calling. There is no curiosity, just denunciation. So what is the compromise? You say you found fraud, so produce the evidence. Regardless of who you side with, the current members are not capable of solving any problem, even one as simple and clear cut as that.
It doesnât matter to me, because I donât depend on social security, so it isnât relevant to me. This isnât the place for a debate, but it illustrates the problem, but I knw ho the next election will be decided, unless the people with standing in this matter (regardless of political leaning) has the desire to find out whether their retirement system is being drained. Thatâs all. Just look at the root of a problem and ask for clarification.
Truth.
1 Like
So much depends on the type of kayak and where you will use it. River running in Class IV conditions is a special use and takes special knowledge. I first went out with a âleaderâ who insisted we all wear helmets and one of the people in our group spun out and hit his head with great force on a rock. But for the helmet he would have needed a rescue and medical care.
Having used kayaks out in the ocean and bays for decades I took a class for sit in kayaks on surf entries. I practiced all day with waves of 2-4 feet in height and it was well worth the cost and my time.
I belonged to a local kayak fishing club but the members were far right in their politics and so I stopped joining their events. Not a big deal in the overall scheme of things.