Does anyone have any experience or knowledge of Werners adjustable ferrule design? I know someone selling a 220 to 240 Kalliste in new condition. Seems this would be a pre Jackson/move werner. Also, my gut tells me that that ferrule would stay tight basically indefinitely with the increased surface area of the joint…possibly longer lasting. So, was there any negative/bad issues with that design other than a few ounces heavier?
Is there a reason you want the adjustable feature.
Normal paddling vs feeling more laid back and lazy with it extended out. That and look how much more shaft overlap there is in the ferrule with infinite feathering. It just looks like it would stand the test of time better with no loosening/wiggling of the ferrule years down the road. I could be wrong tho…,thats why I’m asking.
The adjustable paddle adds a bit of additional expense besides weight. Unless you are paddling multiple boats, for most people a single length is all they need.
As far as feather angle, the majority of people seem to favor unfeathered paddles these days. If you find a feathered paddle feels better to you that’s fine. However, once you decide on a feather angle, stay with it. You want the orientation of the blades to be in muscle memory so you do not have to think when you need to suddenly brace or attempt a roll. The idea of changing the feather angle depending on conditions is largely discredited.
All that being said, if you have the option of buying a used paddle at a good price, go for it. If for some reason you decide you don’t like it, you can probably resell it for what you paid for it.
What is this debate about feathered and unfeathered?