I didn’t believe it, you know, saw it on Fox first. Then I saw it on a trusted news source., so now I wonder what’s true.
So who do you believe? I don’t understand how open minded people get so confused by news sources. Hillary Clinton is a narcissist. Comey misquoted the criminal statute about putting classified material on a private server. Title 18 USC, sec 793 is about providing classified info to a foreign agency with the “intent” of “harming” the US. Sec 794 covers the “unwitting” act without the element of intent (that means the fact of doing it, even unknowingly. Sec 1924 is about mishandling. Comey saved her from jail - look at the penalties. It’s in the statute, but she condemded him for her failed campaign. Now she call Orange man a. Convicted Fellon. He didn’t have a sugsr daddy, like when Sandy Berger was stuffing classified documents in his socks. Remember that?
Biden removed info as a Senator and VP, stored in an office with a known Chinese intel officer who had a key to the office. He had the rest in boxes next to his vette. Do you know the content of that info, it hsdbto do with US policy and Ukraine, remember firing the prosecutor or no billion dollar funding if they don’t stop investigating his son. By the way, VPs have no authority to declassify or retain classified info after the term of office, and ironically, Hillary had a certified SCIF in her residence to conduct classified work from home. I hear from credible sources that she never activsted the secure account. Reformated the stuff and put it on a bathroom server, and the public is . . . What word? . . . Uninformed and . . . Befuddled.
I can explain the presidential retention act, but we probably will end up agreeing to disagree.
The current candidate ran on a platform just 4 years ago. Its on video. People actually voted for her on that platform (correction - she didn’t get a single primary vote). She was touted as the border czar, now she denies it. She bailed out arsonist during the riots. Her running mate let his city burn, his wife said she opened the window to smell the smoke, his daughter told the reactionaries the National Guard hadn’t been called up. He praises China (did you see the articles on PBS and other “trusted news source” about Chinese “police stations” in the US which have no contitutional authority). This administration has weakened restriction on chinese intel activities in the US, and the question is why was it allowed. Laptop is Russian disinformation, until the FBI used it in a trial and authenticate it, but the coolaide drinkers don’t even know that. He denied it was his, until the lawyer asked for his client’s laptop back. Hunter represented a chinese intel officer on crimes of espionage, and he earned 1 million in the process. The guy was an executive of the company that loaned Hunter’s dual use technology company 1.5 billion. He flew back from China with the Big Guy on AF2 for 15 hours, yet Joe was too disinterested in the smartest guy he knows to ask, how did your business swindle go. Need anything from your dear old dad. The average person doesnt know how to process that. Sad!
Now Kamel swears she didn’t change her values. That’s two lies. But which one is the second lie. Last cycle, she ran on a platform that she now reversed and denounced. One lie is certain, but is the first campaign platform real or the new one that mirrors orange man the real candidate. Well, heres one way ti look at it, they all lie, so if you want the first token sonething, then you do what you gotta do.
I don’t care what you believe or who you vote for. If you like what she did during her reign with the dementia patient (she swore he was the brightest guy in the room) he forgot that 13 service personnel were killed in the Afghanistan debacle, and they retaliated by blowing up a guy unloading bottles of water.
Here’s the deal. This isn’t a political discussion. The left/democrat party brought this inflation on us and is doubling down. They ran on the platform, then clueless peolple say: depends on the news source. It does not! I just enter these discussions to assess your problem solving, ability to analyze info, conduct research, arrive at conclusions . . . I really don’t care what party you back, who you vote for, and I can not change your mind.
Furthermore, on more related topics, I do not expect anyone to accept my point of view or method of paddling. These posts reflect your analytical skills. All I can say is, caveat emptor.